"The now nearly 50-year experiment with transit subsidies has fallen
well short of expectations. A more practical result could be obtained by
better prioritization of funding to meet the greatest needs in the
metropolitan reality as it currently exists. . . . In the cities without
legacy cores, and in the suburbs of cities with legacy cores, we should
focus on the needs of those unable to provide their own mobility. This
is far more socially responsible than adding expensive services such as
urban rail that have shown virtually no evidence of reducing driving
alone. . . . In the vast majority of markets, transit has not lured
drivers from their cars to relieve congestion or improve air quality.
And it is wasteful to commit transit funds to achieve purposes other
than improved transportation, such as city-building or place-making.
Transportation is too important to economic growth and prosperity to be
subject to utopian notions."
–Joel Kotkin and Wendell Cox, "The Great Train Robbery: Urban Transportation in the 21st Century," Center for Demographics & Policy, Chapman University, 2017
–Joel Kotkin and Wendell Cox, "The Great Train Robbery: Urban Transportation in the 21st Century," Center for Demographics & Policy, Chapman University, 2017