If one wants to keep things simple, then it could be said that the base of Sierra Club's support for rail is simply a case of garbage in, garbage out. In other words, garbage data were used to come to a garbage conclusion. However, I believe that data were sufficiently twisted to support the underlying car-hating philosophy of "environmentalists."
In this case, the bias is clear because supporting rail (to kill auto) causes huge damage to prime agricultural land. The Sierra Club simply cannot have it both ways.
Explanations are provided in my article in the Hawaii Reporter.
In this case, the bias is clear because supporting rail (to kill auto) causes huge damage to prime agricultural land. The Sierra Club simply cannot have it both ways.
Explanations are provided in my article in the Hawaii Reporter.
Posts
